Formative and Summative Assessments

 

 

 

Classroom assessments fall into the following categories: formative and summative. Formative assessments are the most valuable, as they present the teacher and the student with day-by-day opportunities for discovering the studentŐs current processing of the teacherŐs current lesson style regarding the skill being learned. Summative assessments generally provide an evaluation of the effectiveness of the instructional program along with student competency and are given at the end of instruction.

 

The Tennessee Department of Education has updated how we evaluate our studentŐs thinking skills. Presently, we think of tasks in terms of BloomŐs Taxonomy when designing objectives and target skills. We will now incorporate another set of data called the WebbŐs Depth of Knowledge scale. The newly updated standards are designed to implement this scale using the checks for understanding included in each grade level.

 

WebbŐs Depth of Knowledge (DOK)

 

Level 1: requires simple recall of information: facts, definitions, terms, and procedures.

Level 2: involves the studentŐs ability to make decisions about how to approach a problem or activity such as classifying, organizing, estimating, and the collection and comparison of data.

Level 3: requires strategic thinking such as reasoning, planning, and using data to think at a higher level.

Level 4: requires complex reasoning, planning, developing to make connections both within and among subject domains.

 

http://www.ride.ri.gov/instruction/curriculum/rhodeisland/resources/dokMath.htm

www.education.ky.gov/users/jwyatt/CoreContent/DOK%2012-151.PPT

 

 

 

 

 

Formative Assessments

Observation

Observation of students as they use mathematics in various learning experiences is one of the most important components of assessment.  Observation involves much more than teachers simply interacting with students or watching and listening to students in the classroom.  Observation involves the systematic collection and analysis of observable data while comparing it to the checks for understanding in each skill set. These observations can be used to plan and adjust instruction and to provide key information for feedback to students and parents.

 

Checklists and Anecdotal Comments

Checklists and anecdotal comments are useful tools to structure, direct, and record observations.  These tools are usually supplemented by conversations, conferences, and interviews.  Sometimes, when appropriate, student activities may be audio or video taped.

 

Checklists - Checklists can be used to observe how students use the mathematical processes as they listen, calculate, interact, view, and represent.  StudentsŐ mathematical products- oral, written, visual can also be assessed.

 

Anecdotal notes - Anecdotal notes provide ongoing records about an individual studentŐs performance in listening, speaking, reading, writing, viewing and representing activities, as well as their needs and language development over a period of time.  Methods of recording and keeping anecdotal records on individual students, small groups, or the entire class vary.  Some teachers like to use self-stick notes, labels, or maintain a separate blank page for each student in a binder.  All observations should be dated and focused on what students know and can do. If you choose to create labels, you may keep a label sheet on a clipboard as you move around the room. You may jot down notes to peel and stick in a notebook later. Writing notes while you are actually observing will help you keep accurate notes on a studentŐs progress.

 

Label example:

Student:_____________________

Date:________________________

Observations/Comments

 

Student Anecdotes form to print

http://www.timesaversforteachers.com/index_page0059.htm

 

Standards-based Rubrics

The following information is derived from an excellent website (see below) for rubrics used for the purpose of assessing writing assignments.  The rubric information, however, is applicable to a variety of tasks, and may be developed using the following guidelines.

Rubrics provide clear criteria for evaluating a product or performance on a continuum of quality. Rubrics are not simply checklists with point distributions or lists of requirements.  Well-designed rubrics have the following in common:

 

1. They are task specific:  The more specific a rubric is to a particular task, the more useful it is to the students and the teacher.  The descriptors associated with the criteria should reference specific requirements of the assigned task and clearly describe the quality of work at each level on the rubric.

 

2. They are accompanied by exemplars:  The levels of quality described in the rubric need to be illustrated with models or exemplars.  These anchor papers or sample products help both the students and the teacher to see and understand what quality work looks like as it is described in the rubric.  These models or exemplars can come from past student work or the teacher can create a model to share with the class.

 

3. They are used throughout the instructional process: The criteria used to evaluate student work should be shared as the task is introduced to help students begin with the end in mind.  Rubrics and models should also be referenced while the task is being completed to help students revise their work.  They should also be used after the task is complete, not only to evaluate the product or performance, but also to engage students in reflection on the work they have produced.

 

Ideally, students should be involved in the process of generating rubrics through the careful analysis of exemplars:  by studying the models, students draw inferences about the criteria that are important to a successful product and then describe different levels of performance for each criterion. http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ELA/6-12/Rubrics/Index.htm

 

 

 

Diagnostic Interview

Diagnostic Interview is the basic technique used to assess a broad area for each child. The teacher meets with each student one-on-one to identify the studentsŐ skills acquisition. This information can be used to plan and adjust instruction.

 

 

Self Assessment

Self-assessment is a flexible and useful tool.  Self-assessment helps students develop higher order metacognitive skills and to identify individual learning goals.  Students participate in self-assessment in order to find out what they have learned so they will know what to focus on next.

 

Math Journals

Journal writing is a way to make written communication a regular part of doing mathematics. 

 

Students write about such things as:

á       Their conceptual understandings and problem solving, descriptions of ideas, solutions, and justifications of problems, graphs, charts, and observations.

á       Their questions concerning the current topic, an idea that they may need help with, or an area they donŐt quite understand.

á       Their feelings about aspects of mathematics, their confidence in their understanding, or their fears of being wrong.

 

The work for many performance tasks should go into the journal.  Students should understand that the work is important and the teacher wants to see it, but it is not graded.  A graded journal communicates that there is a specific ŇrightÓ response you are seeking.  It is essential, however, that you read and respond to journal writing. If you do not read and respond to journals, students will quickly come to regard them as busywork and conclude that you do not value their efforts.   On a regular basis, it is manageable to read and respond to about five journals a night.  Students can flag entries that they want teacher attention or a response. 

 

 

 

Writing Prompts and Ideas

á       ŇI think the answer is...I think this becauseÉ

á       Write an explanation for other students (or for students in a lower grade) of why 5x6 is the same as 6x5.

á       Explain to a student in grade X (or a student who is absent today) what you learned in math class today.

á       What did you think was easy about todayŐs math lesson? What was difficult? What do you still have questions about?

á       After you solved todayŐs problems, what did you do so that you were convinced that your answer was correct?

á       Write a story problem that goes with this picture (this graph, this diagram, this equation)

 

Journals for Early Learners - Students respond to a topic or a prompt on a large flipchart.  The teacher writes their ideas, adding their contributorŐs name, and even drawings when appropriate.

 

http://www.pbs.org/teachersource/whats_new/math/assessment0999.shtm

http://www2.ups.edu/community/tofu/lev2/journaling/writemath.htm

http://facultystaff.vwc.edu/~dwilkinson/journal_writings.htm

http://math.about.com/library/weekly/aa123001a.htm

 

Folders and Portfolios

Folders and portfolios are collections of studentsŐ work that exhibit the individual studentŐs effort, progress, and achievements in one or more areas.  The collection must include student participation in selecting the contents, the criteria for judging merit, and evidence of studentsŐ self-reflection.  Portfolios can be placed in three-ring binders or folders and students can have regular scheduled times to update their portfolios. Folders and portfolios can be an important part of the assessment and evaluation process.  These tools also help students become more accountable, more independent, and more responsible for their learning.  Folders and portfolios can assist in reporting, and can be used as a basis for conversation between the teachers, the student, and the parent. Students can also take time to reflect on what they have achieved, what they are including in their portfolios, and the goals that they have set for themselves.  Folders and portfolios can include a number of work samples that reflect the objectives of their curriculum, the studentsŐ processes and products, and self-evaluations including personal achievements and goals).  After parent-student-teacher conference, parent comments can be added.

 

Performance Assessment (student work)

Performance assessment in mathematics allows students to demonstrate their understanding of a mathematical concept.  There is more emphasis on studentsŐ thinking and demonstrating than traditional paper and pencil tests.  Since students are able to show what they understand, performance assessments allow for students at all achievement levels to be successful.  A low achiever can demonstrate what he or she knows, and a high achiever can use the same assessment to show a more in-depth understanding of the same concept, all while using the same assessment questions.

 

Performance assessments allow teachers to evaluate the mathematical process standards as set forth in the NCTM Principles and Standards.  Processes such as problem solving, reasoning, and communication can best be assessed through student observation. These processes are difficult to assess by traditional tests alone.  Performance assessments allow educators to get a more Ňthree-dimensionalÓ view of studentsŐ thinking.

 

Homework

Homework can serve several purposes. It can be used to reinforce, apply, or extend the math children are learning in class (Burns and Silbey, 2000). All homework should be based on skills and concepts that have already been taught and never anything new. Homework assignments given for reinforcement lets students practice newly learned skills through drills (Van De Walle, 2004). Other homework allows for the practical application of mathematical concepts through problem-based tasks. Extension exercises permit individualized and creative thinking by emphasizing student initiative and research (Eddy, 1984). Homework also allows parents to stay abreast of what their children are learning.

 

Additionally, homework can be a source of informal assessment. Teachers can view homework after being checked, and identify those concepts or skills with which students had the most difficulty. This is valuable information that can be used during the planning phase of instruction. Homework, too, can provide data regarding individual students that is helpful in diagnosing their strengths and weaknesses (Burns and Silbey, 2000).

 

 

 

 

There are four generalizations that can guide the teachers in the use of Homework (Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2001):

 

3    The estimated amount of homework assigned to students should be different given the grade level.

 

á       Grades K-1     10 minutes

á       Grades 2-3     30 minutes

á       Grades 4-5     40 minutes

 

3      Parental involvement in homework should be kept to a minimum.

 

3      The purpose of homework should be identified and articulated.

 

3      If homework is assigned, it should be commented on.

 

Summative Assessments

Testing

Testing will always be a part of teaching.  We test to get an idea of student performance on certain concepts and skills.  Testing should reflect the instruction being taught.  However, tests should not only be used for computation and basic skill knowledge, but they need to allow students to demonstrate a conceptual basis for the process.  Tests should go beyond the basics and give the teacher an idea of how the students think, process, and connect ideas. The goal of these evaluations  should be to determine if students have mastered specific competencies and to identify instructional areas that need revision. Examples of summative tests include chapter tests, final exams, statewide exams, and national exams.

 

 

More information on assessments:

 

http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/basic/basica.html

 

http://www.nmsa.org/store/

 

http://my.nctm.org/eBusiness/ProductCatalog